Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Washington v. Ocean Harbor Casualty Insurance Company
as 2:2023cv03776
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Washington
Defendant:
Ocean Harbor Casualty Insurance Company
Interested Party:
Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv05002
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Tyrone Washington v. People of the State of Illinois
as 22-1939
Petitioner:
TYRONE WASHINGTON
Respondent:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS
Rodriguez v. Washington et al
as 3:2022cv00176
Plaintiff:
Antonio Rodriguez and Tanya Rodriguez
Defendant:
ABF Freight System, Inc., Derrick Tyron Washington and ABF Freight
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
WASHINGTON v. CIRCLE K STORES INC
as 4:2021cv00297
Plaintiff:
Tryon Washington and TYRON WASHINGTON
Defendant:
Circle K Stores, Inc. and CIRCLE K STORES INC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396
WASHINGTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv41940
Plaintiff:
LEONARD TYRONE WASHINGTON
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tyrone Washington v. Warden James T Vaughn Correcti, et al
as 19-2096
Defendant / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE and WARDEN JAMES T VAUGHN CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TYRONE WASHINGTON
Washington v. Laney
as 6:2017cv02052
Respondent:
Garrett Laney
Unknown:
Lynn David Larsen
Petitioner:
Tyrone Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Washington v. Metzger et al
as 1:2017cv01274
Petitioner:
Tyrone Washington
Respondent:
Dana Metzger and Matt Denn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv04133
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
