Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Barbour v. Holder
as 11-2057
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENT BARBOUR
Defendant - Appellee:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U.S. Attorney General, in his individual and official capacities
Barbour v. Holder
as 11-2058
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENT BARBOUR
Defendant - Appellee:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U.S. Attorney General, in his individual and official capacities
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-1731
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00288
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv10181
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Phelps v. Local 0222 et al
as 1:2009cv11218
Plaintiff:
Coy Phelps
Defendant:
Local 0222, American Federation of Government Employees AFL-C10, ATS Corporation (Trulinks/Trufone) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv11245
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv10973
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Velazquez-Linares v. United States Government, et al
as 08-1548
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARIA VELAZQUEZ-LINARES
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES, Government, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, JOHN E. POTTER, Postmaster General and others
Mederos v. Murphy et al
as 1:2007cv12229
Petitioner:
Antonio Mederos
Defendant:
Robert Murphy, Michael Chertoff and U.S. Attorney General
Respondent:
Bruce Chadbourne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
