Cases 1 - 10 of 126
Curne v. United States of America et al
as 4:2023cv00564
Plaintiff:
Jarrell Curne
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Eric Caffey v. Merrick B. Garland, et al
as 23-1904
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Eric Lydell Caffey
Defendant / Appellee:
Merrick B. Garland, U.S. Attorney General, DeWayne Hendrix, Warden, FCI - Forrest City, Sheila Woodard, Former Clinical Director, FCI - Forrest City (Medium) and others
Henry v. United States of America et al
as 4:2023cv00143
Petitioner:
David M Henry
Defendant:
Attorney General United States of America, U.S. Attorney Western District of Missouri, Federal Bureau of Investigation and others
Christy et al v. United States Department of State et al
as 4:2023cv00113
Plaintiff:
Bryana D Christy, Aaron W Christy, Bryana Danielle Christy and others
Defendant:
Department of State, U.S. Attorney General, United States Department of State and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-3652
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Richard Wolf Guts v. USP Tucson AZ, et al
as 22-3143
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Richard Wolf Guts
Defendant / Appellee:
USP Tucson AZ, U.S. Attorney General, U.S. Attorneys, at USP Tucson Arizona and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv03229
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00010
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Todd Farver v. Craig Gaumer
as 22-2362
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Todd Roger Farver
Defendant / Appellee:
Craig Peyton Gaumer, U.S. Attorney
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2252
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
