Cases 21 - 30 of 188
Christian v. U.S. Bank N.A. et al
as 9:2020cv80432
Defendant:
U.S. Bank N.A, Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. (SPS) and U.S. Bank N.A.
Plaintiff:
Christian and Kareen Christian
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. U.S. Bank N.A. et al
as 0:2020cv60543
Plaintiff:
Eddie Lee Smith, Sr.
Defendant:
Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. (SPS) and U.S. Bank N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
U.S. Bank N.A. v. Lofgren et al
as 6:2020cv00334
Defendant:
Christopher G. Lofgren and All Occupants John Doe 1-10
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DE LA CRUZ et al v. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC. et al
as 1:2020cv20562
Defendant:
SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC., U.S. BANK, N.A., AS TRUSTEE FOR GSAMP TRUST 2006-HE5 and U.S. Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff:
ANDRES DE LA CRUZ and MONICA DE LA CRUZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00078
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Muhammad et al v. U.S. Bank, N.A. et al
as 1:2019cv05357
Defendant:
U.S. Bank, N.A., Troutman & Sanders, L.P., Aldrige Pite, LLP and others
Plaintiff:
Dorothea Muhammad and Ali S. Muhammad
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2601
U.S. Bank N.A. v. Robert Walker, et al
as 19-13944
Plaintiff / Appellee:
U.S. BANK N.A.
Defendant / Appellant:
TAMIKO WALKER and ROBERT WALKER
IOU Central, Inc. v. Mason et al
as 1:2019cv04202
Defendant:
Sporty's Taphouse and Grill, Inc., Gatekeeper Services, LLC, Arbor Square II, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
IOU Central, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2019cv81249
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
U.S. Bank N.A. v. Robert Walker, et al
as 19-12037
Plaintiff / Appellee:
U.S. BANK N.A.
Defendant / Appellant:
TAMIKO WALKER and ROBERT WALKER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
