Cases 41 - 50 of 65
Michael Vaughan v. Kentucky Army National Guard, et al
as 16-5686
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL DEAN VAUGHAN
Defendant - Appellee:
KENTUCKY ARMY NATIONAL GUARD, NATIONAL GUARD BUREAU, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY and others
HUNTON & WILLIAMS LLP v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
as 1:2015cv01208
Plaintiff:
HUNTON & WILLIAMS LLP
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
DOE v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
as 3:2015cv00072
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
U.S. Department of the Army
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
DOE v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
as 1:2014cv01583
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Contreras v. U.S. Department of the Army, et al
as 2:2014cv01820
Plaintiff:
Graciela M. Contreras
Defendant:
U.S. Department of the Army, John McHugh and The United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lucero v. Obama
as 1:2014cv01491
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Lucero
Defendant:
Barak Obama and U.S. Department of the Army, The
Cause Of Action: 10 U.S.C. § 1552
Lyda Conner v. U.S. Department of the Army, et al
as 14-5355
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LYDA P. CONNER
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, JOHN MCHUGH, Secretary of the Army, THOMAS R. LAMONT, Assistant Secretary of the Army and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-6283
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Professional Helicopter Pilots Association Local 102 et al v. U.S. Department of the Army et al
as 1:2013cv00164
Plaintiff:
Professional Helicopter Pilots Association Local 102 , Ronald L. Arsenault , James Lee Bloxsom and others
Defendant:
U.S. Department of the Army and John M. McHugh
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Odonoghue v. U.S. Department of the Army
as 1:2012cv04959
Plaintiff:
Wycliffe H. Odonoghue
Defendant:
U.S. Department of the Army
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
