Cases 31 - 40 of 52
Clayton v. U.S. Department of Veteran Affairs
as 5:2019cv00024
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Veteran Affairs and U.S. Department of Veterans Affiars
Plaintiff:
James Earl Clayton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00391
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00750
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv08727
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-11107
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Stephens v. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
as 4:2018cv01878
Plaintiff:
Jon Stephens
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Johnson v. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs et al
as 5:2018cv00039
Plaintiff:
R. Wayne Johnson
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs and VA Does 1-15
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Thomas v. Shulkin et al
as 1:2017cv00282
Plaintiff:
Dietrich Thomas
Defendant:
David J. Shulkin, U.S. Department Of Veterans Affairs, Anthony Dawson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Bruce Becker v. David Shulkin, Secretary, et al
as 17-50871
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRUCE BECKER
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID J. SHULKIN, SECRETARY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERAN AFFAIRS, THOMAS J. MURPHY, Principal Deputy Under Secretary for Benefits, Department of Veterans Affairs and MARLAN P. WALDROP, Regional Director, Veterans Affairs Houston Regional Office
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-50459
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
