Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 149
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv11582
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ogunmola v. Whaling
as 20-2724
Respondent: William P. Barr, in his official capacity as Attorney General, of the United States, Kevin McAleenan, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Jeffery Searls, in his official capacity as Facility Director, Buffalo Federal Detention Facility and others
Petitioner: Saidat Iyabo Ogunmola
Marvin Garcia v. Field Office Director United S, et al
as 20-2735
Plaintiff / Appellee: MARVIN AGUILAR GARCIA
Defendant / Appellant: DIRECTOR EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW, in his official capacity as Director of the Executive Office for Immigration Review, SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT and others
Martinez Roman v. Decker
as 20-3004
Petitioner / Appellant: Marco Martinez Roman
Respondent / Appellee: Attorney General William P. Barr, in his official capacity as Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, Director Thomas Decker, in his official capacity as Field Office Director, New York City Field Office, U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement and Acting Secretary Chad F. Wolf, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Mohammed Siddiqui, et al v. ICE, et al
as 20-2762
Petitioner: Sergio Gallego, Inemo Seimokuma Clement, Sauveur Victor and others
Respondent / Appellee: Joel L. Brott, Sherburne County Sheriff, U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, Matthew Albence, Deputy Director and Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Director of the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Petitioner / Appellant: Mohammed Siddiqui
Kaylan v. U.S. Attorney General et al
as 3:2020cv01030
Respondent: U.S. Attorney General and U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement
Petitioner: Ahlain Saing Kaylan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Grant v. Decker
as 20-2739
Respondent: Director Thomas Decker, in his official capacity as Field Office Director, New York City Field Office, U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement, Attorney General William P. Barr, in his official capacity as Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice and Acting Secretary Chad F. Wolf, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Petitioner: Dudley Grant
CAPITAL AREA IMMIGRANTS' RIGHTS COALITION et al v. TRUMP et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv02117
Defendant: U.S. CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION SERVICES, U.S. IMMIGRATION & CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW and others
Plaintiff: CAPITAL AREA IMMIGRANTS' RIGHTS COALITION, REFUGEE AND IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION AND LEGAL SERVICES, INC., HUMAN RIGHTS FIRST and others
Petitioner: KIDS IN NEED OF DEFENSE (KIND) and PROFESSORS OF IMMIGRATION LAW
Amicus Curiae: IMMIGRATION REFORM LAW INSTITUTE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Fawzi Zaya v. Rebecca Adducci, et al
as 20-1667
Respondent: WILLIAM P. BARR, U.S. Attorney General, REBECCA ADDUCCI, in her official capacity as Detroit Field Office Director, Enforcement and Removal Operations, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security and others
Petitioner: FAWZI ZAYA and FAWZI SAMI ZAYA
Barbecho v. Decker
as 20-2207
Petitioner: Milton Barbecho, Jose Molina, Felipe Diaz Presbot and others
Respondent: Acting Director Chad F. Wolf, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and Director Thomas Decker, in his official capacity as Director of the New York Field Office of U.S. Immigrations & Customs Enforcement

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?