Cases filed in the First Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 44
Celimen Savino, et al v. Souza
as 20-1768
Interested Party: JHONY BONILLA OCHOA, KARINA ROJAS VARGAS, CARLOS CARANGUI and others
Petitioner: MARIA ALEJANDRA CELIMEN SAVINO, and all those similarly situated and JULIO CESAR MEDEIROS NEVES, and all those similarly situated
Respondent: TODD M. LYONS, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the Boston Field Office of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, STEVEN J. SOUZA, in his official capacity as Superintendent of the Bristol County House of Corrections, THOMAS M. HODGSON, in his official capacity as Bristol County Sheriff and others
Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2020cv11311
Plaintiff: State of Minnesota, State of Maryland, State of Connecticut and others
Defendant: U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Matthew T. Albence, Chad F. Wolf and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Celimen Savino, et al v. Souza
as 20-1626
Respondent: IMMIGRATION CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, in his official capacity as Deputy DIrector and Senior Official Performing the Duties of the DIrector for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, THOMAS M. HODGSON, in his official capacity as Bristol County Sheriff and others
Respondent / Appellee: STEVEN J. SOUZA, in his official capacity as Superintendent of the Bristol County House of Corrections, TODD M. LYONS, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the Boston Field Office of Immigrations and Customs Enforcement and CHAD F. WOLF, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the Department of Homeland Security
Petitioner / Appellant: JULIO CESAR MEDEIROS NEVES, and all those similarly situated and MARIA ALEJANDRA CELIMEN SAVINO, and all those similarly situated
Interested Party: RICK RAEMISCH, JULIO MEDEIROS NEVES JUNIO, KARINA ROJAS VARGAS and others
President and Fellows of Harvard College et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al Featured Case
as 1:2020cv11283
Defendant: United States Department of Homeland Security, Matthew Albence, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Plaintiff: President and Fellows of Harvard College and Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Amicus Curiae: LinkedIn Corp., Dropbox, Inc., The Catholic University of America and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Molina, et al v. Albence, et al
as 20-1629
Petitioner: ADRIANO DA SILVA MEDEIROS, LUIS ORLANDO DURAND LUYO and JOSE MARCOS PALACIOS MOLINA
Respondent: TODD M. LYONS, Acting Field Office Director, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, Acting Director, U.S, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, DANIEL W. MARTIN, Warden, Donald W. Wyatt Detention Facility and others
Celimen Savino, et al v. Souza, et al
as 20-1564
Petitioner: JULIO CESAR MEDEIROS NEVES, and all those similarly situated and MARIA ALEJANDRA CELIMEN SAVINO, and all those similarly situated
Respondent: IMMIGRATION CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, in his official capacity as Deputy DIrector and Senior Official Performing the Duties of the DIrector for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, STEVEN J. SOUZA, in his official capacity as Superintendent of the Bristol County House of Corrections and others
Interested Party: RICK RAEMISCH, JULIO MEDEIROS NEVES JUNIO, KARINA ROJAS VARGAS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv10617
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Pereira Brito, et al v. Barr, et al
as 20-1119
Petitioner: GILBERTO PEREIRA BRITO, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated, FLORENTIN AVILA LUCAS, Individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated and JACKY CELICOURT, Individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated
Interested Party: JOHN A. HAWKINSON
Respondent: CHRISTOPHER BRACKETT, Superintendent of the Strafford County Department of Corrections, ANTONE MONIZ, Superintendent of the Plymouth County Correctional Facility, YOLANDA SMITH, Superintendent of the Suffolk County House of Corrections and others
Respondent / Appellee: JAMES MCHENRY, Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, YOLANDA SMITH, Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, LORI STREETER, Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice and others
Alasaad, et al v. Wolf, et al
as 20-1081
Interested Party: REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS, CONSTITUTIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY CENTER, R STREET INSTITUTE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: JEREMIE DUPIN, AARON GACH, NADIA ALASAAD and others
Defendant / Appellee: MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, Acting Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, in his official capacity, CHAD WOLF, Acting Secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, in his official capacity and MARK A. MORGAN, Acting Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection, in his official capacity
Plaintiff: TECHFREEDOM
Defendant / Appellant: MARK A. MORGAN, Acting Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, in his official capacity and CHAD WOLF, Acting Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, in his official capacity
Plaintiff / Appellee: SUHAIB ALLABABIDI
Alasaad, et al v. Wolf, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-1077
Plaintiff / Appellee: MATTHEW WRIGHT, NADIA ALASAAD, MOHAMMED AKRAM SHIBLY and others
Interested Party: REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS, R STREET INSTITUTE, CENTER FOR DEMOCRACY & TECHNOLOGY and others
Defendant / Appellant: THOMAS D. HOMAN, Acting Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, in his official capacity, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, Acting Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection, in his official capacity, ELAINE DUKE, Acting Secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, in her official capacity and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?