Cases 1 - 10 of 19
STARKS v. U.S MARSHALS SERVICE
as 1:2023cv01612
Plaintiff:
BRANDI STARKS
Defendant:
U.S MARSHALS SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Hecke v. Beck et al
as 1:2023cv00286
Plaintiff:
Steven John Hecke
Defendant:
Richard Beck, David Gladieux, David Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BENNETT v. U.S. MARSHAL'S
as 1:2022cv00302
Plaintiff:
KEVIN BENNETT
Defendant:
U.S. MARSHAL'S
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Randle v. Gladieux et al
as 1:2021cv00425
Plaintiff:
Payne T Randle and Payne Thomas Randle
Defendant:
David Gladieux, Allen County Jail and Unkown U.S. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reid v. Lawson et al
as 3:2021cv00380
Plaintiff:
Teron Reid and Teron A Reid
Defendant:
Julie Lawson, U.S. Marshal Service, U.S. Marshal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WRIGHT v. U.S. MARSHAL SERVICE et al
as 2:2020cv00626
Plaintiff:
MARCUS WRIGHT
Defendant:
U.S. MARSHAL SERVICE, T. J. WATSON and WILLIAM BARR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
English v. Rodovich
as 2:2020cv00260
Defendant:
Andrew P Rodovich Officer of the Court doing business as Federal Magistrate, United States District Court, Philip P. Simon and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Dwayne English
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dejohnette v. Indiana U.S. Marshal Services Northern District et al
as 2:2017cv00241
Defendant:
Indiana U.S. Marshal Services Northern District and Chad Kolitwenzew
Plaintiff:
Bobby Dejohnette
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Birner v. U.S. Marshall Service
as 3:2017cv00092
Plaintiff:
Curtis W Birner
Defendant:
U.S. Marshall Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SWALLERS v. F.B.I. et al
as 1:2016cv00656
Defendant:
F.B.I., U.S MARSHALS SERVICE and U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE
Plaintiff:
BRENT SWALLERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
