Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Johnson v. U.S. Postal Service
as 6:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
R Wayne Johnson
Defendant:
U.S. Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 39 U.S.C. § 409 Postal Service
Johnson v. U.S. Postal Service et al
as 4:2023cv02060
Plaintiff:
R Wayne Johnson
Defendant:
U.S. Postal Service, U.S. Department of Veteran Affairs and U.S. Department Of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Lundahl v. Smith
as 23-10562
Petitioner / Appellant:
Holli Telford Lundahl
Respondent / Appellee:
M. Smith, Carswell FMC, Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General, Collete Peters, Director of the BOP and others
Johnson v. Tipton et al
as 6:2023cv00023
Plaintiff:
R Wayne Johnson
Defendant:
Drew B. Tipton, US Attorney Houston Jennifer B. Lowery, Judge Drew B. Tipton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Willis v. Villegas et al
as 4:2021cv00414
Defendant:
Fransico Villegas, U.T.M.B. ADS Estelle Unit, U.S. Postal Services, Walker County and others
Plaintiff:
Tommy Willis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dearing v. U.S. Postal Service et al
as 5:2020cv00131
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Dearing
Defendant:
U.S. Postal Service, Wilkinson County Correctional Facility, The Great State of Mississippi c/o Jim Hood and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carr v. Gonzalez et al
as 4:2019cv01754
Defendant:
Probable Cause Judge, Texas Post Master General, U.S. Postal Service and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond E. Carr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carr v. Gonzalez et al
as 1:2019cv00506
Defendant:
Probable Cause Judge, Texas Post Master General, New Hope Housing and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond E. Carr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Romans v. U.S. Dpt. Justice et al
as 4:2018cv04634
Defendant:
U.S. Postal Service and U.S. Dpt. Justice
Plaintiff:
Derek Romans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
