Cases filed in the US District Court for the Central District of California
Cases 1 - 10 of 128
Boyce A. Stringer et al v. American Biltrite, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv09813
Defendant: DOMCO PRODUCTS TEXAS, INC., Individually and as Successor-In-Interest to, and formerly known as DOMCO INC., FLOOR PRODUCTS (TEXAS), AZROCK INDUSTRIES INC., UVALDE ROCK ASPHALT COMPANY, REDCO CORPORATION, formerly known as CRANE CO., Individually and as Successor-In-Interest to COCHRANE CORPORATION, AMERICAN BILTRITE INC. and others
Plaintiff: Boyce Stringer, Nancy Stringer, Boyce A. Stringer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Asbestos Litigation
Josephine Banks et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2022cv06892
Plaintiff: Josephine Banks, Jamie Banks, Nuevoe Strain and others
Defendant: 3M Company, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, successor by merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc., Armstrong International Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Nikolaus J. Marcher et al v. Air and Liquid Systems Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00059
Plaintiff: Nikolaus J. Marcher and Lynne Marcher
Petitioner: National Steel and Shipbuilding Company
Defendant: Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, sued individually and as successor-in-interest to Buffalo Pumps, Inc., 3M Company aka Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, AES Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Benito C. Valdez, Jr. et al v. Air and Liquid Systems Corporation, Buffalo Pumps Division et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv08863
Plaintiff: Benito C. Valdez, Jr. and Georgia Valdez
Petitioner: Electrolux Home Products, Inc., as successor-in-interest to Copes-Vulcan, Inc.
Defendant: CBS Corporation, Electrolux Home Products, Inc., Air and Liquid Systems Corporation, Buffalo Pumps Division and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Maria Del Carmen Chinchillas et al v. Dap Products, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv08181
Plaintiff: Maria del Carmen Diaz Chinchillas, Eduardo Lorenzo Navarrete Palacios and Yolanda Arely Navarrete Palacios
Defendant: Dap Products, Inc., John K. Bice Co. Inc., Kaiser Gypsum Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Judith Karmon v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2021cv02023
Defendant: Fisher Scientific Company L.L.C., Vanderbilt Minerals LLC, ACCO Engineered Systems, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Judith Karmon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Janet E Carpenter et al v. 3M Company, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv11797
Plaintiff: Brian H Carpenter, Tanya D Hardin, Teri D Carpenter and others
Defendant: Warren Pumps, LLC, Weir Valves & Controls USA, Inc., BP Amoco Chemical Company and others
Petitioner: Flowserve US Inc.
Consolidated Defendant: Spirax Sarco, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Janet E. Carpenter et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2020cv11810
Plaintiff: Janet E. Carpenter, Tanya D. Hardin, Brian H. Carpenter and others
Defendant: Gardner Denver, Inc., Spirax Sarco, Inc., Carver Pump Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Robert Strangman et al v. Aeron Marine Shipping Company et al
as 2:2020cv11611
Plaintiff: Alison Strangman and Robert Strangman
Petitioner: Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Successor by Merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc.
Defendant: Soco-West, Inc., CBS Corporation, Honeywell International, Inc. and others
Intervenor: Great American Insurance Company, United States Fire Insurance Company, Federal Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Polly Gastrom v. 3M Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv10464
Plaintiff: Polly Gastrom and Suzzane Nesbit
Defendant: Vigor Industrial LLC, 3M Company, Occidental Chemical Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?