Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Cambridge Christian School, Inc. v. Florida High School Athletic Association, Inc.
as 22-11222
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CAMBRIDGE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
FLORIDA HIGH SCHOOL ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION, INC.
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Amicus Curiae:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, ASSOCIATION OF CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INTERNATIONAL, FREEDOM FROM RELIGION FOUNDATION, INC., and others
We The Patriots USA, Inc et al v. Connecticut Office of Early Childhood Development et al
as 3:2021cv00597
Plaintiff:
CT FREEDOM ALLIANCE, LLC, WE THE PATRIOTS USA, INC., Constantina Lora and others
Defendant:
Connecticut State Department of Education, Glastonbury Board of Education, Bethel Board of Education and others
Amicus Curiae:
Child USA, Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Central Conference of American Rabbis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
303 Creative, et al v. Elenis, et al
as 19-1413
Defendant / Appellee:
ANTHONY ARAGON, HEIDI HESS, MIGUEL RENE ELIAS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LORIE SMITH and 303 CREATIVE LLC, a limited liability company
Petitioner:
FOUNDATION FOR MORAL LAW
Amicus Curiae:
CATO INSTITUTE, CENTER FOR RELIGIOUS EXPRESSION, CATHOLICVOTE.ORG EDUCATION FUND and others
Drew Adams v. School Board of St. Johns Co.
as 18-13592
Amicus Curiae:
WOMEN'S LAW PROJECT, CHAMPION WOMEN, AMERICAN COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS and others
Not Classified By Court:
REPLACEMENTS, LTD., TWITTER INC., YELP INC. and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DREW ADAMS, a minor, by and through his next friend and mother, Erica Adams Kasper
Defendant / Appellant:
SCHOOL BOARD OF ST. JOHNS COUNTY, FLORIDA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-1715
Amicus Curiae:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-2445
Amicus Curiae:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
James Obergefell, et al v. Richard Hodges, et al
as 14-3057
Amicus Curiae:
WOMEN'S LAW PROJECT, NATIONAL CENTER FOR LESBIAN RIGHTS, GARY J. GATES and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DAVID BRIAN MICHENER, ROBERT GRUNN, JAMES OBERGEFELL and others
Defendant:
CAMILLE JONES
Intervenor:
CRAIG SCHEIDLER, EQUALITY OHIO, SARAH RUTH MARSHALL and others
Defendant / Appellant:
THEODORE WYMYSLO, MD, In his official capacity as the Director of the Ohio Department of Health, LANCE D. HIMES, In his official capacity as the Interim Director of The Ohio Department of Health and RICHARD HODGES
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-1446
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Supporting Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
American Atheists, et al v. Duncan, et al
as 08-4061
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AMERICAN ATHEISTS, INC, a Texas non-profit corporation, R. ANDREWS, S. CLARK and others
Defendant - Appellee:
SCOTT T. DUNCAN, Colonel, Superintendent, Utah Highway Patrol, JOHN NJORD, Executive Director, Utah Department of Transportation and F. KEITH STEPAN, Director Division of Facilities Construction and Management Department of Administrative Services
Defendant-Intervenor - Appellee:
UTAH HIGHWAY PATROL ASSOCIATION
Not A Party In Lower Court - Amicus Curiae:
THE UNITARIAN UNIVERSALIST ASSOCIATION, THE UNION FOR REFORM JUDAISM, THE SOCIETY FOR HUMANISTIC JUDAISM and others
American Atheists, Inc., et al v. City of Detroit Downtown Dev.
as 07-2445
Plaintiff - Appellant Cross-Appellee:
AMERICAN ATHEISTS, INCORPORATED, STEVE WALKER, LAW OFFICES OF DENNIS G. VATSIS, P.C. and others
Defendant:
CITY OF DETROIT DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Intervenor - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
ST. JOHN'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE, AMERICANS UNITED FOR SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE, AMERICANS FOR RELIGIOUS LIBERTY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
