Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Illinois Valley Paving Company, et al v. Old Republic Insurance Company, et al
as 13-2063
Plaintiff - Appellant: Illinois Valley Paving Company and Continental Casualty Company
Defendant - Appellee: Old Republic Insurance Company, United Rentals Highway Technologies, Inc. and American Alternative Insurance Corporation
Defendant: Missouri Highway Transportation Commission, United Contractors Midwest, Inc., Concrete Coring Company of St. Louis, Inc. and others
Type: Contract Insurance
Banerjee et al v. The Demoya Group, Inc. et al
as 9:2012cv81004
Plaintiff: Tapan Banerjee and Manuela Banerjee
Defendant: The Demoya Group, Inc., TBE Group, Inc., A & B Engineering, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Type: Contract Insurance
E&B Paving Inc v. McLean et al
as 3:2012cv00255
Defendant: Jay McLean, United Rentals Highway Technologies Inc , Old Republic Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff: E&B Paving Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Insurance
Bekkouche v. United Rentals, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2011cv00282
Defendant: United Rentals, Inc. , United Rentals (North America), Inc. , United Rentals Highway Technologies, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Ahmed Bekkouche
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl Petition for Removal - Product Liability
Continental Casualty Company et al v. United Rentals Highway Technologies, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv00300
Plaintiff: Continental Casualty Company, Continental Casualty Company and Zurich North America Insurance Company
Defendant: United Rentals Highway Technologies, Inc., Ace American Insurance Company, Ace American Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Contract None
Sandoval et al v. Woudenberg Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 2:2008cv02358
Defendant: Cargotec Corporation, United Rentals Highway Technologies, Inc., United Rentals Highway Technologies, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Eloisa Sandoval, Giselle Sandoval, Manuel Sandoval and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Torts - Injury Both
Labarbera et al v. United Rentals Highway Technologies, Inc.
as 1:2007cv03444
Plaintiff: Gary Labarbera, Thomas Gesualdi, Lawrence Kudla and others
Defendant: United Rentals Highway Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
United Rentals Highway Technologies, Inc. v. Old Republic Insurance Co. Inc., et al
as 1:2007cv21351
Plaintiff: United Rentals Highway Technologies, Inc., United Rentals Highway Technologies, Inc., Old Republic Insurance Co. Inc., and others
Defendant: Petro Hydro Inc. and Jeffrey D. Swartz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Type: Contract Insurance
United Rentals Highway Technologies, Inc. et al v. Hoover Construction Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2007cv01443
Plaintiff: United Rentals Highway Technologies, Inc., United Rentals Highway Technologies, Inc., United Rentals Highway Technologies, Inc. and others
Defendant: Hoover Construction Company, Hoover Construction Company, B Nelson Transport and others
Counter Claimant: Hoover Construction Company
Counter Defendant: United Rentals Highway Technologies, Inc. and Republic Insurance Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
UNITED RENTALS HIGHWAY TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al v. E & B PAVING, INC. et al
as 1:2007cv00289
Plaintiff: UNITED RENTALS HIGHWAY TECHNOLOGIES, INC., UNITED RENTALS HIGHWAY TECHNOLOGIES, INC., UNITED RENTALS HIGHWAY TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and others
Defendant: E & B PAVING, INC., E & B PAVING, INC., DONALD S. ROSS and others
Cross Claimant: E & B PAVING, INC. and E & B PAVING, INC.
Cross Defendant: UNITED RENTALS HIGHWAY TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and OLD REPUBLIC INSURANCE CO.
Counter Claimant: E & B PAVING, INC. and E & B PAVING, INC.
Counter Defendant: UNITED RENTALS HIGHWAY TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and OLD REPUBLIC INSURANCE CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Type: Contract Insurance

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?