Cases 1 - 10 of 17,480
MATHIS et al v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2024cv01312
Plaintiff:
W. MATHIS and K. DAVIS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, PATRICIA K. CUSHWA, COURT SERVICES AND OFFENDER SUPERVISION AGENCY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 794 Rehabilitation Act
IGOREVICH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv01317
Plaintiff:
SIVOKONEV PAVEL IGOREVICH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Woodards v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
Tre'von Anthony Woodards
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tolliver (PS) v. Courts Judical et al
as 1:2024cv01244
Plaintiff:
Kamilah Tolliver
Defendant:
Courts Judical, United States and District Courts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Banda-Martinez v. United States of America et al
as 4:2024cv00391
Plaintiff:
Betzabel Banda-Martinez
Defendant:
United States of America and Luis Curiel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MARCHISOTTO v. SANCHEZ et al
as 1:2024cv05870
Plaintiff:
JOHN F. MARCHISOTTO
Defendant:
JUDGE JUAN R. SANCHEZ, KENT A. JORDAN, MICHAEL A. CHAGARES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Victor v. The United States of America
as 1:2024cv11198
Plaintiff:
Danielle Victor
Defendant:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01672
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Dowling v. United States Attorney's Office
as 5:2024cv00447
Plaintiff:
Angela D. Dowling and Angela Perez Dowling
Defendant:
United States Attorney's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1414
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
