Cases 61 - 70 of 423
Western Watersheds Project, et al v. United States Bureau of Land Management, et al
as 22-8022
Petitioner / Appellant:
WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY and UPPER GREEN RIVER ALLIANCE
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, WILLIAM PERRY PENDLEY, in his official capacity as Deputy Director of the U.S. Bureau of Land Management, JONAH ENERGY, LLC and others
Cascadia Wildlands et al v. United States Bureau of Land Management
as 6:2022cv00204
Plaintiff:
Cascadia Wildlands, Oregon Wild and Klamath-Siskiyou Wildlands Center
Defendant:
Bureau of Land Management and United States Bureau of Land Management
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
State of Alaska Department of v. Federal Subsistence Board, et al
as 22-35097
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STATE OF ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL SUBSISTENCE BOARD, DAVID SCHMID, in his official capacityas the Regional Supervisor for the United States Forest Service, SONNY PERDUE, in his official capacity as the United States Secretary of Agriculture and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
ORGANIZED VILLAGE OF KAKE
Arcamone-Makinano, et al v. Haaland, et al
as 22-8006
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AMELIA ARCAMONE-MAKINANO, CRAIG C. DOWNER, TOM GAGNON and others
Defendant / Appellee:
DEBORAH HAALAND, in her official capacity as Secretary of United States Department of Interior and TRACY STONE-MANNING, in her official capacity as Director of United States Bureau of Land Management
Klamath-Siskiyou Wildlands Center et al v. United States Bureau of Land Management
as 1:2021cv01647
Plaintiff:
Klamath-Siskiyou Wildlands Center, Soda Mountain Wilderness Council, Oregon Wild and others
Defendant:
United States Bureau of Land Management
Intervenor Defendant:
Murphy Company
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Friends of Animals v. United States Bureau of Land Management
as 1:2021cv03037
Plaintiff:
Friends of Animals
Defendant:
The United States Bureau of Land Management and United States Bureau of Land Management
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Arcamone-Makinano et al v. United States Department of the Interior Secretary et al
as 0:2021cv00196
Defendant:
United States Department of the Interior Secretary, United States Bureau of Land Management Director, Deborah Halaand and others
Plaintiff:
Amelia Arcamone-Makinano, Bonifacio Makinano and Pauline St. Denis
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Center for Biological Diversity et al v. U.S. Bureau of Land Management et al
as 4:2021cv00411
Plaintiff:
Center for Biological Diversity and Maricopa Audubon Society
Defendant:
U.S. Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, United States Bureau of Land Management and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Dine Citizens Against Ruining Our Environment, et al v. Haaland, et al
as 21-2116
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DINE CITIZENS AGAINST RUINING OUR ENVIRONMENT, SAN JUAN CITIZENS ALLIANCE, SIERRA CLUB and others
Defendant / Appellee:
DEBRA HAALAND, in her official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, an agency within the Unite States Department of the Interior, TIM SPISAK, in his official capacity as Acting New Mexico State Director of the United States Bureau of Land Management and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE, DJR ENERGY HOLDINGS, LLC, SIMCOE, LLC and others
Amicus Curiae:
INSTITUTE FOR POLICY INTEGRITY AT NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW
Center For Biological Diversity et al v. United States Bureau of Land Management et al
as 3:2021cv07171
Plaintiff:
Center For Biological Diversity, Sierra Club, Desert Survivors and others
Defendant:
Deputy Director Nada Wolff Culver, United States Bureau of Land Management, State Director Karen Mouritsen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
