Cases 1 - 10 of 1,634
Reza v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00098
Petitioner:
Matthew Reza
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Lebron v. United States of America
as 5:2024hc02093
Petitioner:
Jose Antonio Lebron
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bran v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2024cv00310
Petitioner:
Jose Armando Bran
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Forbes v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00194
Petitioner:
Dennis A. Forbes
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Mixson v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00242
Petitioner:
Rondall Clyde Mixson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Fleitas v. Rokosky
as 1:2024cv00112
Petitioner:
Carlos Fleitas
Respondent:
United States of America and E. Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Dugan v. United States of America et al
as 5:2024cv00041
Petitioner:
Jeremy Dugan
Respondent:
United States of America and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Brown v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00024
Petitioner:
Jamel T. Brown
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Juan Arvizu-Hernandez v. Warden Ray
as 24-6155
Petitioner:
JUAN CARLOS ARVIZU-HERNANDEZ
Respondent:
WARDEN RAY and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
McCall v. United States of America
as 5:2024hc02041
Petitioner:
Dashawn Jewelin McCall
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
