Cases 1 - 10 of 99
Ballard v. Dozier et al
as 5:2018ct03213
Defendant:
Officer Hunt, Unknown Female Officer, John J. Dozier and others
Plaintiff:
Robert S. Ballard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellis v. Wing, et al
as 1:2018cv00036
Plaintiff:
Liberty Beth Ellis
Defendant:
Jon Wing, Kenny Hipps, Charles S. McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
BAILEY v. GARDNER et al
as 1:2016cv00577
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant:
JOSEPH GARDNER, C. C. BLAKE, R. M. ASHLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. LARSON et al
as 1:2016cv00345
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant:
STIG LARSON, FAYETTEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA POLICE DEPARTMENT, UNKNOWN LT SUPERVISOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. GARDNER et al
as 1:2016cv00335
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant:
JOSEPH GARDNER, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES LICENSE AND THEFT DIVISION, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. GARDNER et al
as 1:2016cv00287
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant:
JOSEPH GARDNER, K. D. MACKEY, C. C. BLAKE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. GARDNER et al
as 1:2016cv00284
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant:
JOSEPH GARDNER, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR., K. D. MACKEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. GARDNER et al
as 1:2016cv00245
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant:
JOSEPH GARDNER, C.C. BLAKE, R.M ASHLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bailey v. North Carolina Department of Motor Vehicles et al
as 5:2013cv00612
Plaintiff:
Robert Gene Bailey
Defendant:
North Carolina Department of Motor Vehicles, Joseph Gardner, William C. Toman, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bailey v. North Carolina Department of Motor Vehicles et al
as 5:2013cv00603
Plaintiff:
Robert Gene Bailey
Defendant:
North Carolina Department of Motor Vehicles, Joseph Gardner, William C. Toman, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
