Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00979
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv04728
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv05384
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Lillywhite v. AECOM et al
as 2:2018cv01840
Defendant:
AECOM's Severance Plan, URS Corporation, AECOM and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Lillywhite
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Klein v. Aetna Life Insurance Company et al
as 4:2018cv03496
Defendant:
Aetna Life Insurance Company and URS Corporation Welfare Benefits Plan
Plaintiff:
Galen Klein
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
n v. The Lambert Firm PLC, et al
as 17-35844
Intervenor - Appellant:
GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY PROJECT, GAP, PROJECT ON GOVERNMENT OVERSIGHT, INC., POGO and CURTIS HALL, putative intervenor
Appellee:
THE LAMBERT FIRM PLC, Former Counsel for Gary Brunson
Defendant - Appellee:
BECHTEL NATIONAL, INC., BECHTEL CORPORATION, URS CORPORATION and others
Gary Brunson v. Bechtel National, Inc., et al
as 17-35402
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GARY BRUNSON, United States of America ex rel.
Defendant - Appellee:
BECHTEL NATIONAL, INC., BECHTEL CORPORATION, URS CORPORATION and others
URS Corporation v. Transpo Group Inc
as 15-35657
Plaintiff / Appellee:
URS CORPORATION, a Nevada corporation
Defendant / Appellant:
TRANSPO GROUP INC, a Washington corporation
Marin v. URS Corporation et al
as 3:2015cv01383
Defendant:
AECOM Technology Corporation and URS Corporation
Plaintiff:
Kevin Marin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Hunter v. URS Corporation
as 3:2015cv02300
Plaintiff:
Michael Hunter
Defendant:
URS Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
