Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Young v. Biden et al
as 2:2023cv01515
Plaintiff:
David John Young
Defendant:
Joe Biden, Biden Administration, US Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
v. Mays et al
as 4:2023cv01478
Plaintiff:
Michael J Mays
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Herman Harris, Kenneth Parham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LAREDO v. USA et al
as 2:2022cv02713
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO LAREDO
Defendant:
USA, FEDERAL BOP, DIRECTOR OF THE FBOP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LAMM v. US ATTORNEY GENERAL
as 1:2022cv00116
Plaintiff:
DEVIN ERIC LAMM
Defendant:
US ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. USA et al
as 1:2021cv01517
Defendant:
Dept of Justice, US Attorney General and USA
Plaintiff:
Timothy Doyle Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JORDAN v. US ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 5:2020cv00210
Plaintiff:
ANDRE PELE JORDAN
Defendant:
IVANKA TRUMP, US ATTORNEY GENERAL, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JORDAN v. TRUMP et al
as 5:2020cv00208
Plaintiff:
ANDRE PELE JORDAN
Defendant:
IVANKA TRUMP, US ATTORNEY GENERAL and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHITE v. US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 4:2017cv00251
Plaintiff:
ROBERT G WHITE
Defendant:
US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, US ATTORNEY GENERAL, ERIC HOLDER, JR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MILLER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2014cv02785
Defendant:
US Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr. and United States of America
Plaintiff:
Daniel Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William Dekle v. FCI Jesup Warden, et al
as 12-11890
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM E. DEKLE
Defendant - Appellee:
FCI JESUP WARDEN, R. E. HOLT, S.E.R.O. Regional Director, ROBIN GLADDEN, Temp. Director B.O.P. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
