Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Hargis v. US Bancorp et al
as 4:2010cv00027
Plaintiff:
Bonnie Hargis
Defendant:
US Bancorp and JLB Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Samuel Lipari v. US Bancorp, NA, et al
as 09-3203
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Samuel K. Lipari
Defendant - Appellee:
US Bancorp, NA and US Bank NA
iGate, Inc. v. US Bancorp et al
as 0:2009cv02497
Plaintiff:
iGate, Inc., iGate, Inc. and iGate, Inc.
Defendant:
US Bancorp, US Bancorp, US Bancorp and others
Counter Claimant:
US Bank National Association, US Bank National Association, US Bancorp and others
Counter Defendant:
iGate, Inc., iGate, Inc. and iGate, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Type:
Other Statutes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2009cv02193
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Type:
Other Statutes
Strege v. Deutsche Hypotheken bank et al
as 0:2009cv01350
Plaintiff:
Adam Paul Strege
Defendant:
Deutsche Hypotheken bank, Deutsche Hypotheken bank, US Bancorp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Type:
Civil Rights
Samuel Lipari v. US Bancorp, NA, et al
as 08-3984
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Samuel K. Lipari
Defendant - Appellee:
US Bancorp, NA and US Bank NA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2008cv05979
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Samuel Lipari v. US Bancorp, NA, et al
as 08-3428
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Samuel K. Lipari
Defendant - Appellee:
US Bancorp, NA and US Bank NA
Samuel Lipari v. US Bancorp, NA, et al
as 08-3087
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Samuel K. Lipari
Defendant - Appellee:
US Bancorp, NA and US Bank NA
Kawa v. US Bancorp et al
as 8:2008cv00091
Plaintiff:
Thomas J. Kawa
Defendant:
US Bancorp, Biorn, HS Financial Group and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
