Cases 1 - 8 of 8
COX v. US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2023cv01601
Plaintiff:
WELBY THOMAS COX, JR.
Defendant:
US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and ZACHARY A. MYERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
McCorkle v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv00297
Plaintiff:
Michael McCorkle
Defendant:
US Department of Justice, Assistant US Attorney and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
STATE OF INDIANA et al v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2022cv00430
Plaintiff:
STATE OF INDIANA, THE STATE OF ARIZONA, STATE OF ARKANSAS and others
Defendant:
PRESIDENT JOSEPH R. BIDEN, EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT, ATTORNEY GENERAL MERRICK B. GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Owens v. US Department of Justice
as 3:2020cv00033
Plaintiff:
Lester Loviad Owens
Defendant:
US Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cantu v. US Department of Justice et al
as 3:2017cv00527
Plaintiff:
Antonio Cantu, Sr
Defendant:
US Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Designation Sentencing Computation Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FREEMAN v. US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE DRUG ENFORCEMENT AGENCY
as 1:2013cv00102
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM FREEMAN
Defendant:
US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE DRUG ENFORCEMENT AGENCY
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Seamster v. US Department of Justice et al
as 2:2011cv00371
Plaintiff:
Deborah R Seamster
Defendant:
US Department of Justice, US Secret Service and FBI Headquarters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SUMMERS et al v. US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 2:2008cv00023
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER SUMMERS
Respondent:
US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and MS. MARBERRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
