Cases 11 - 20 of 38
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv05482
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Peer v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America et al
as 2:2012cv14437
Defendant:
The Prudential Insurance Company of America and US Foodservice, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Michelle Peer
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
In Re: US Foodservice Inc Pric
as 12-1311
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Catholic Healthcare West, Thomas & King, Inc., Waterbury Hospital, o/b/o themselves & others similarly situated and others
Defendant:
Koninklijke Ahold N.V., Gordon Redgate and Brady Schoefield
Defendant - Appellant:
US Foodservice Inc.
In Re: US Foodservice Inc Pric
as 11-5193
Petitioner:
US Foodservice Inc.
Respondent:
Catholic Healthcare West, Thomas & King, Inc., Waterbury Hospital, o/b/o themselves & others similarly situated and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00624
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
US Foodservice Inc v. Keener et al
as 2:2011cv01009
Plaintiff:
US Foodservice Inc
Defendant:
Jay Keener and Smithco Meats Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
US Foodservice Inc. v. Kim et al
as 1:2011cv00182
Plaintiff:
US Foodservice Inc.
Defendant:
Hong Kim and Taeho Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dana Caples v. Prudential Ins Co. of America, et al
as 11-30120
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANA D. CAPLES
Defendant - Appellee:
US FOODSERVICE INC, incorrectly named U.S. Foodservices, Inc. and HEWITT ASSOCIATES
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. US Foodservice, Inc.
as 1:2010cv02942
Plaintiff:
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
US Foodservice, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv01293
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
