Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Ketzbeau v. Ivy et al
as 4:2024cv11006
Plaintiff:
Jesse I Ketzbeau
Defendant:
Curtis Ivy, Jr., Frances K. Behm, Nancy Abraham and others
El-Bey v. Butler County Jail et al
as 1:2023cv00285
Plaintiff:
Jttonali One Eye El-Bey
Defendant:
Butler County Jail, Richard K. Jones, Sheriff, Robert Carpenter; 2675 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wagner v. Mahoning County Sheriff et al
as 4:2022cv00475
Petitioner:
Keith M. Wagner
Respondent:
Mahoning County Sheriff and US Marshals
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Whipple v. Jolley et al
as 6:2021cv00161
Plaintiff:
Robert Z. Whipple, III
Defendant:
David Jolley, Elaine Rivera, Charlotte Luckstone and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Tate #145822 v. Michigan Parole Board et al
as 1:2021cv00243
Petitioner:
Curtis Tate #145822 and Willie Perry Woods
Respondent:
Michigan Parole Board, US Marshals Service and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jerdine v. Barr, et al.
as 4:2020cv00569
Plaintiff:
Jerdine
Defendant:
Barr, Robin K. Grimes, US Marshal ND of Ohio and others
Petitioner:
Anthony Lewis Jerdine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bayon v. North East Ohio Core Civic (NEOCC) et al
as 4:2020cv00551
Plaintiff:
Carlos Bayon
Defendant:
North East Ohio Core Civic (NEOCC), US Marshals, USA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bielicki v. Chief U.S. Marshal, et al.
as 4:2016cv02677
Plaintiff:
Jason Bielicki
Respondent:
Chief US Marshal , Warden and DSCC Director
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cook v. Chief U.S. Marshal, et al.
as 4:2016cv01529
Plaintiff:
Alex Cook
Defendant:
Chief US Marshal, Warden and DSCC Director
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reed v. Chief US Marshal et al
as 4:2016cv01207
Petitioner:
Douglas Reed
Respondent:
Chief US Marshal, DSCC Director and Warden FCI Elkton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
