Cases filed in North Dakota
Cases 1 - 10 of 662
Drever et al v. Franz et al
as 1:2024cv00072
Plaintiff: Timothy Michael Drever, Patriot Coil Services USA Corp and Patriot Equipment Ltd
Defendant: Arlon Franz, Don Franz and Grizzly Coil Tubing Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
USA v. One Ruger, Security-9 Pistol, Cal: 9MM, Serial Number: 382-03778
as 3:2024cv00067
Plaintiff: USA
Defendant: One Ruger, Security-9 Pistol, Cal: 9MM, Serial Number: 382-03778
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Wymore v. USA
as 1:2024cv00065
Petitioner: Bradwin Earl Wymore
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Walker v. USA
as 1:2024cv00064
Petitioner: Derrick Stephen Walker
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Hendrickson v. Univar Solutions USA Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00060
Plaintiff: James Hendrickson
Defendant: Univar Solutions USA Inc., Univar Solutions USA LLC and Univar Solutions USA I&S LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Schutz v. USA
as 3:2024cv00046
Petitioner: Kayla Marie Schutz
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Johnson v. USA
as 3:2024cv00044
Petitioner: Anthony Jermaine Johnson
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Ali v. AT and T et al
as 3:2023cv00224
Plaintiff: Ms. Jaami Ali
Defendant: AT and T, T-Mobile USA Inc, T-Mobile for Sprint and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Armstrong v. USA
as 1:2023cv00202
Petitioner: Terrell Jason Armstrong
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Counts v. USA
as 3:2023cv00193
Petitioner: Roger Ricky Counts
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?