Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Shetty v. Attorney General et al
as 3:2017cv00925
Plaintiff:
Shruti Shetty
Defendant:
Attorney General, Apple, Philips and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Association of v. USA Govt.et al
as 1:2015cv05603
Plaintiff:
Association of
Defendant:
USA Govt. and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Roy v. No Defendants Listed
as 1:2014cv01960
Defendant:
All States of USA, Associated Press, Democratic Party and others
Plaintiff:
Rev. Ms. Lisa Nirban Roy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kamal Roy v. Supreme Court of US, et al
as 12-3365
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KAMAL KARNA ROY, For Sey and Volunteers Officer of Non Profit Conglomerate & Associations (17-1 Millions) In Number an Volunteer Fiducial Officer See Page1A For Details
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPREME COURT OF US, JOHN G. ROBERTS, JR., Chief Judge, USA GOVT and others
ROY v. USA GOVT et al
as 2:2012cv04857
Plaintiff:
KKK ROY
Defendant:
USA GOVT, PIYADI BHATSCHAPPE, M ZYSINSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kamal Roy v. USA Govt, et al
as 12-2586
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KAMAL KARNA ROY
Defendant - Appellee:
USA GOVT, FACEBOOK, et al. and REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE
ROY v. REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITEE OF USA et al
as 2:2012cv01371
Plaintiff:
KKK ROY
Defendant:
REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITEE OF USA, USA GOVT and FACEBOOK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Mary Mathis v. Erie County Collection, et al
as 12-1495
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARY A. MATHIS
Defendant - Appellee:
ERIE COUNTY COLLECTION, USA GOVT and PENNSYLVANIA
Mary Mathis v. USA Govt, et al
as 12-1494
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARY A. MATHIS
Defendant - Appellee:
USA GOVT, ERIE CTY CT, ERIE COUNTY COLLECTION and others
Roy et al v. USA Govt
as 8:2011cv00388
Plaintiff:
Conglomerate 2, Jungle Demupods and Rev. KKK Roy
Defendant:
USA Govt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
