Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 115
Berry v. Seized Federal Security
as 21-1459
Interested Party: USA TODAY, NEW YORK TIMES, CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: DUANE L. BERRY
Defendant / Appellee: SEIZED FEDERAL SECURITY
PARACHA v. BUSH et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2004cv02022
Petitioner: SAIFULLAH PARACHA, FARHAT PARACHA, ASSOCIATED PRESS and others
Defendant: BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II
Interested Party: PRIVILEGE TEAM
Respondent: GEORGE WALKER BUSH, DONALD HENRY RUMSFELD and JAY HOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Banks v. U.S. Marshals Judiciary Security Division et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00890
Respondent: New York Times, U.S. Department of Justice, Fox News and others
Petitioner: Frederick Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
In Re: National Prescription Opiate Litigation
as 1:2017md02804
Defendant: National Prescription Opiate Litigation, McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff: City of Toledo, City of Lorain, County of Cuyahoga and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff: Allergan Finance LLC, HBC Service Company, Discount Drug Mart, Inc. and others
Interested Party: United States, U.S. Department of Justice, Drug Enforcement Administration, Webb County, TX and others
Intervenor: USA Today, Chicago Tribune Company, Los Angeles Times and others
Special Master: Francis McGovern, David Rosenblum Cohen and Cathy Yanni
Respondent: Linda Singer and Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC
3Rd Party Defendant: Jane Does, Pfizer Inc., King Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Counter Defendant: Scott County Indiana Board of Commissioners
Counter Claimant: Christopher C. Smith and James Coomer
Not Classified By Court: State of Ohio Board of Pharmacy
Amicus Curiae: Manatee Memorial Hospital, Allegiance Health Center of Ruston, Allegiance Specialty Hospital of Greenville and others
Petitioner: Paul Andrew Pyfer, David B. Gustin, Kenneth Mills and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
ANAM et al v. BUSH et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2004cv01194
Petitioner: BISHER NASER ALI ALMARWALH, MASAAB OMAR AL-MADHWANI, ABDULKHALIQ AL-BAIDHANI and others
Respondent: GEORGE WALKER BUSH, DONALD RUMSFELD, JAY HOOD and others
Amicus Curiae: CHARLES B. GITTINGS, JR., MUSLIM ADVOCATES, DUE PROCESS SCHOLARS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Nicklen et al v. Mashable, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv10300
Defendant: Advance Publications, Inc., CONDE NAST ENTERTAINMENT, LLC, Tegna, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Paul Nicklen and Cristina Mittermeier
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
GANNETT SATELLITE INFORMATION NETWORK, LLC v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE et al
as 1:2021cv02212
Plaintiff: GANNETT SATELLITE INFORMATION NETWORK, LLC doing business as USA TODAY
Defendant: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE and NATIONAL GUARD BUREAU
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Suris v. Gannett Co., Inc.
as 21-1981
Plaintiff / Appellant: Yaroslav Suris, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee: Gannett Co., Inc., DBA USA Today and Gannett Satellite Information Network, Inc., DBA USA Today
AL-ZARNOUQI et al v. BUSH et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2006cv01767
Petitioner: MOHAMED AL-ZARNOUQI, MASHOUR ABDULLAH MUQBEL ALSABRI, MOHAMED MUQBEL AHMED ALSABRI and others
Respondent: GEORGE WALKER BUSH, DONALD RUMSFELD, HARRY B. HARRIS, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Kazmierczak v. Federal Bureau of Investigations et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv14092
Defendant: Dr. Benjamin, Environmental Protection Agency, Atlanta Journal Constitution and others
Plaintiff: Jacek Kazmierczak
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?