Cases 41 - 50 of 102
Ms. L., et al v. ICE, et al
as 18-56151
Petitioner - Appellee:
MS. L. and MS. C.
Respondent - Appellant:
U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION and others
DUENAS-CLAROS et al v. U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT et al
as 1:2018cv01923
Defendant:
KEVIN M. MCALEENAN, L. FRANCIS CISSNA, DANIEL BIBLE and others
Plaintiff:
L.M.D. and LEYDI DUENAS-CLAROS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clarke v. DHS Secretary et al
as 1:2018cv06665
Defendant:
The USCIS District Director NY District, National Benefits Center, DHS Secretary and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel Fitzgerald Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-16753
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv05028
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shon Ashby v. U. S. Department of State
as 17-1532
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHON ASHBY
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, USCIS and REX TILLERSON, Secretary of State
Al-Omari v. Ortiz et al
as 1:2017cv00412
Plaintiff:
Hussein Al-Omari
Defendant:
Mario Ortiz, Jesse Mendez, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Belal Abed Mohammad Mustafa v. USCIS
as 8:2016cv01732
Plaintiff:
Belal Abed Mohammad Mustafa
Defendant:
USCIS
Ashby v. U.S. Department of State et al
as 3:2016cv00585
Plaintiff:
Shon Ashby
Defendant:
U.S. Department of State and United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, (USCIS)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
OKEYO v. USCIS et al
as 2:2016cv00818
Plaintiff:
PATRICK L OKEYO
Defendant:
USCIS, U.S. ARMY and U.S. NAVY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
