Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Alva v. Lew Lewisburg USP et al
as 2:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
James Scott Alva
Defendant:
Lew Lewisburg USP, Ber Berlin FCI, N Cairns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Nandlal v. Oregon Cascade Properties LLC et al
as 2:2021cv01481
Plaintiff:
Heralal A Nandlal and Shopalx LLC
Defendant:
Oregon Cascade Products LLC, Hull, Holiday, Holiday PLC, Market Edge Realty LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Dell v. Trump, et al.
as 3:2020cv09256
Defendant:
Alameda County Sheriff's Department, San Leandro Police, USPS and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Lucas O'Dell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ehsanollah Heidari-Mojaz v. Doe et al
as 5:2020cv00154
Defendant:
DOE and USPS
Plaintiff:
Ted Mojaz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
(PS) Le v. Dwyer et al
as 2:2019cv00414
Defendant:
Fabillaran, USPS, Molly C. Dwyer and others
Plaintiff:
Helen Le
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
v. USPS et al
as 2:2015cv00194
Defendant:
USPS and Megan J Brennan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Emrit et al v. United States Postal Service (USPS) et al
as 3:2014cv00534
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit and Nicole Rocio Leal-Mendez
Defendant:
U.S. Postal Inspection Service and United States Postal Service (USPS)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Golez v. Donahoe et al
as 3:2012cv02293
Plaintiff:
Wilfredo A Golez
Defendant:
Donahoe and USPS Postmaster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
David Bryant v. United States Bureau of Prison, et al
as 11-56371
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID BRYANT
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS, HARLEY G. LAPPIN, in his official capacity as Director of the United States Bureau of Prisons, ROBERT E. MCFADDEN, in his official capacity as Regional Director of the United States Bureau of Prions Western Region and others
Marvin Watson v. USP Lompoc
as 2:2011cv01791
Respondent:
Captain G. Rosalez, Linda Sanders and USP Lompoc
Petitioner:
Marvin Watson
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
