Cases 1 - 10 of 265
Underhill v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01343
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Underhill
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Teva Womens Health, LLC, Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gibson, et al. v. City of Portland, et al.
as 24-1663
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH GIBSON and RUSSELL SCHULTZ
Defendant:
CITY OF PORTLAND, COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH, MULTNOMAH COUNTY OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY and others
Newman v. Underhill, et al.
as 24-1493
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL NEWMAN
Defendant:
TODD UNDERHILL, Deputy, JONATHAN BARMER, Deputy, LAUREN LAIDLAW and others
Phillips v. Strack et al
as 1:2024cv02100
Plaintiff:
Dezzan D. Phillips
Defendant:
Daina Strack, Ben Slocum, Jason Edgecomb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Underhill v. Metro Government et al
as 3:2024cv00171
Plaintiff:
Lisa Underhill
Defendant:
Metro Government and Mike O'Connell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1437 U.S. Housing Act of 1937
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00245
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Jonchuck, Jr. v. Dixon et al
as 3:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
John N. Jonchuck, Jr.
Defendant:
Ricky D. Dixon, Christopher Lane, Stephens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Demarest v. Town of Underhill
as 24-147
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID P. DEMAREST
Defendant / Appellee:
TOWN OF UNDERHILL, a municipality and charter town, DANIEL STEINABAUER, as an individual and in official capacity as Selectboard Chair, BOB STONE, as an individual and in official capacity and others
Sanders v. Dixon et al
as 3:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
Alfred James Sanders
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon, Barry V. Reddish, Underhill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
