Cases 81 - 90 of 112
Kim v. New York City et al
as 1:2010cv09316
Plaintiff:
Edward Kim
Defendant:
New York City, Police Officer and Unidentified Police Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Coles v. Cooke et al
as 1:2010cv01315
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Coles
Defendant:
Earl Cooke, Alexandria Virginia Police Department, Seth Weinstein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Cooke et al
as 1:2010cv01317
Plaintiff:
Raymond Williams
Defendant:
Earl Cooke, Seth Weinstein, Unidentified Police Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Butler v. New York City et al
as 1:2010cv07974
Plaintiff:
Duchaun Butler
Defendant:
New York City, Humberto Kibel, Layton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. City of New York
as 10-3877
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Levon Smith
Defendant - Appellee:
City of New York, Jorge Tobon, Police Officer, Shield #29637, Heribert Bermudez, Police Officer, Shield # 30246 and others
Rowe et al v. New York City et al
as 1:2010cv05058
Plaintiff:
Davial Rowe and Nagi Benson
Defendant:
New York City, Richard Mack, Douglas L. Graham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MILES et al v. THE TOWNSHIP OF DENVILLE et al
as 2:2010cv03010
Plaintiff:
MAUREEN MILES
Defendant:
THE TOWNSHIP OF DENVILLE, THE DENVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, RICHARD BYRNE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ACKRIDGE v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2010cv02420
Plaintiff:
FLORENCE ACKRIDGE
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JOHN MCCLOSKY, CURTIS MATTHEWS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Connor-Lucas v. New York City et al
as 1:2010cv02863
Plaintiff:
Corinne Connor-Lucas
Defendant:
New York City , Unidentified Police Officers and The City of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bailey et al v. Garay et al
as 1:2010cv02851
Plaintiff:
Dominique T. Bailey and Danique Love-Billy
Defendant:
Brian Garay , Santiago, Unidentified Police Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
