Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 843
M K Mall Holdings L L C v. Underwriters at Lloyds of London et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2023cv01455
Plaintiff: MK Mall Holdings, LLC and M K Mall Holdings L L C
Defendant: Underwriters at Lloyds, of London, Indian Harbor Insurance Company, QBE Specialty Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Bucktown Development, LLC v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London et al
as 2:2023cv06133
Plaintiff: Bucktown Development, LLC
Defendant: Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London, Indian Harbor Insurance Company, QBE Specialty Insurance Company and others
Interested Party: Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Carriage Court Condominiums Owners Association v. Renaissance Re et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv05544
Plaintiff: Carriage Court Condominiums Owners Association
Defendant: Renaissance Re - Syndicate 1458, Old Republic Union Insurance Company, Renaissance Re and others
Interested Party: Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0205 - Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards
Type: Contract Insurance
Plaisance, et al v. Taylor-Seidenbach, Inc., et al
as 2:2023cv05426
Plaintiff: Corbert J Plaisance, Sr., Corbert J Plaisance, Sr, Corbert J Plaisance, Jr. and others
Cross Defendant: Eagle, Inc., Taylor-Seidenbach, Inc., Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation and others
Defendant: Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (as insurer of Wayne Manufacturing Company), Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff: Huntington Ingalls Incorporated
3Rd Party Defendant: Travelers Indemnity Company, Travelers Casualty and Surety Company, Bayer CropScience, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Ursuline Provincialate, Central Province of the United States v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London et al
as 3:2023cv01389
Plaintiff: URSULINE PROVINCIALATE, CENTRAL PROVINCE OF THE UNITED STATES
Defendant: Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London, INDIAN HARBOR INSURANCE COMPANY, QBE Specialty Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Type: Contract Insurance
Union Insurance Company v. PocketiNet Communications Inc et al
as 4:2023cv05151
Plaintiff: Union Insurance Company
Defendant: PocketiNet Communications Inc and David Madrigal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Type: Contract Insurance
General Mill Supplies, Inc. v. Underwriters at Lloyds, London et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv06464
Plaintiff: General Mill Supplies, Inc.
Counter Claimant: Underwriters at Lloyd's, London, QBE Specialty Insurance Company, Steadfast Insurance Company and others
Defendant: Indian Harbor Insurance Company, General Security Indemnity Company of Arizona, United Specialty Insurance Company and others
Interested Party: Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0004 Arbitration
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London v. Mpire Properties, LLC
as 23-7613
Petitioner / Appellant: CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS, LONDON, INDIAN HARBOR INSURANCE COMPANY, QBE SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Respondent / Appellee: MPIRE PROPERTIES, LLC
Royal Waterbeds, Inc. et al v. Union Insurance Company
as 4:2023cv01194
Plaintiff: Royal Waterbeds, Royal Waterbeds, Inc. and Boyd STL Retail Properties, LLC
Defendant: Union Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Illinois Union Insurance Company et al v. Skipper et al
as 1:2023cv04934
Plaintiff: Illinois Union Insurance Company
Defendant: Elix Skipper, Samantha Walker, Stacey Colin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)
Type: Contract Insurance

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?