Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv02387
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-1331
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Watkins v. The Chicago Housing Authority et al
as 1:2011cv04966
Plaintiff:
Joseph Watkins
Defendant:
The Chicago Housing Authority, United States Department of Housing Urban Development , United States Department of Labor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv04782
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
PKF Mark III Inc, et al v. Fndtn for Fair Contracting, et al
as 11-2061
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PKF/MARK III INC, PETER E. GETCHELL, STEPHEN P. NEIDHART and others
Defendant - Appellee:
FNDTN FOR FAIR CONTRACTING, THOMAS ST. JOHN, NJ REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS and others
Stephen Lothlorien v. United Brotherhood of Carpente, et al
as 11-15242
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEPHEN LOTHLORIEN
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED BROTHERHOOD OF CARPENTERS AND JOINERS OF AMERICA, BRIAN BORYSEWICH, BETH BORYSEWICH and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv00251
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-5158
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Richard Dinicola, et al v. West Coast Consulting LLC, et al
as 09-17248
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD DINICOLA
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN LOTHLORIEN
Defendant - Appellee:
WEST COAST CONSULTING LLC, EASTRIDGE INFOTECH TECHNOLOGY, UNITED BROTHERHOOD OF CARPENTERS AND JOINERS OF AMERICA and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv05993
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
