Cases 11 - 20 of 2,282
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10586
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00404
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Barrett v. Local 804 Union of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters (IBT)
as 24-1139
Plaintiff:
JAHMIL O. BARRETT
Defendant:
LOCAL 804 UNION OF THE INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS (IBT) and UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02619
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hernandez v. Rodriguez et al
as 5:2024cv00137
Plaintiff:
Anthony Hernandez
Defendant:
Yosvany Rodriguez, United Parcel Service, Inc., Coyote Logistics, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Auto Negligence
BLAKEY v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC
as 5:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
TERRENCE BLAKEY
Defendant:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. and UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Williams v. UPS, Inc., et al
as 2:2024cv01203
Plaintiff:
Trina Williams
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc. and Andrew Kern
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03325
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01200
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
