Cases 51 - 60 of 83,266
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04161
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
USA v. Approx. $73,212.71, et al.,
as 2:2024mc00204
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Approximately $73,212.71 seized from Preferred Bank account number 23009403, Approximately $13,738.24 seized from Preferred Bank account number 23009438, Approximately $1,378,783.42 seized from UBS AG account number GE 46907 and others
Claimant:
Run It Up, Inc. and Won It All, Inc.
Scott v. United States Department of Veterans Affairs
as 2:2024cv01144
Plaintiff:
Gene Edward Scott, II
Defendant:
United States Department of Veterans Affairs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
MPL Brands NV, Inc v. UNITED STATES DISTILLED PRODUCTS COMPANY
as 3:2024cv02974
Plaintiff:
MPL Brands NV, Inc
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DISTILLED PRODUCTS COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Mattia et al v. United States of America et al
as 4:2024cv00252
Plaintiff:
Annette Mattia, Floyd Mattia, Mitchell Mattia and others
Defendant:
United States of America and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Wrongful Death
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv01041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
United States of America v. Glover
as 24-3134
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ZAKARY GLOVER
United States of America v. Williams
as 24-3158
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
CHARLES JAMES WILLIAMS
United States of America v. Pridgen
as 24-3149
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JAMES DOUGLAS PRIDGEN
United States of America v. Mendoza
as 24-3128
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
TOMAS MENDOZA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
