Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 74,044
USA v. James Leroy
as 24-1841
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: JAMES MARK LEROY
GEICO v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE et al
as 2:2024cv05929
Plaintiff: GEICO a/s/o Raquel Vizcainobarroso
Defendant: UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and Carlos Mazza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Bristol Myers Squibb Co v. Secretary United States Department of Health and H, et al
as 24-1820
Plaintiff: BRISTOL MYERS SQUIBB CO
Defendant: SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, ADMINISTRATOR CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
ARMSTRONG v. UNITED STATES et al
as 2:2024cv01912
Plaintiff: ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG
Defendant: UNITED STATES and INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Board of Trustees, Plumbers and Pipefitters Local Union No. 74 Pension Fund et al v. Summit Mechanical, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00558
Plaintiff: Board of Trustees, Plumbers and Pipefitters Local Union No. 74 Pension Fund, Board of Trustees, Plumbers and Pipefitters Local Union No. 74 Annuity Fund, Board of trustess, Plumbers and Pipefitters Local Union No. 74 Welfare Fund and others
Defendant: Summit Mechanical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
USA v. Tamir Douglas
as 24-1850
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: TAMIR DOUGLAS
INGRAM v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv02029
Plaintiff: JOSHUA INGRAM
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
USA v. Norman Blackwell
as 24-1840
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: NORMAN BLACKWELL
USA v. Shawn Tribbett
as 24-1857
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: SHAWN TRIBBETT, also known as Marsh, also known as Mellow
USA v. Gregory Makozy, Sr.
as 24-1844
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: GREGORY MAKOZY, SR.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?