Cases 11 - 20 of 39
JACKSON v. UNITED STATES
as 2:2020cv00359
Respondent:
UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS
Petitioner:
JAITEE L. JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GHAHARY et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2019cv19119
Defendant:
FEDERAL TRANSFER CENTER, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS, US MARSHALLS SERVICE US MARSHALLS SERVICE and others
Plaintiff:
DARIUS A GHAHARY and DARIUS F GHAHARY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2019cv03560
Defendant:
MS. BESTEDO, CHRISTINE NELSON, DR. ODEIDA DALMASI and others
Plaintiff:
TERENCE D. JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yeh v. United States Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2018cv00943
Plaintiff:
John TC Yeh
Defendant:
United States Bureau of Prisons, Mark S. Inch, Michael Carvajal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Castillo-Campos v. United States Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2017cv01828
Petitioner:
Serafin Castillo-Campos
Respondent:
United States Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rodriguez v. United States Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2016cv02531
Plaintiff:
Ernesto Jose Chavez Rodriguez
Defendant:
United States Bureau of Prisons, L. J. Oddo, M Magyar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Freeman v. United States Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2016cv02422
Plaintiff:
Rocky L. Freeman
Defendant:
United States Bureau of Prisons, U.S. Probation Department, J. Lincalis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SCHMURA v. UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2016cv08686
Petitioner:
PAUL JOSEPH SCHMURA
Respondent:
UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ZAKHARENKO v. UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 3:2016cv00183
Petitioner:
IVAN VALERIYEVICH ZAKHARENKO
Respondent:
UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Spigelman v. Oddo et al
as 3:2016cv00848
Petitioner:
Joel Spigelman
Respondent:
Oddo, United States Bureau of Prisons and Jane or John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
