Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Jean Coulter v. James Coulter, et al
as 23-2222
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEAN ELIZABETH COULTER
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES P. COULTER, KAREN VERO MORROW, S. MICHAEL YEAGER and others
COULTER v. COULTER et al
as 2:2022cv01806
Plaintiff:
JEAN COULTER
Defendant:
JAMES P. COULTER, SUSAN VERO COULTER, KAREN VERO MORROW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
C. et al v. FOUNDATIONS BEHAVIORAL HEALTH et al
as 2:2020cv06431
Defendant:
FOUNDATIONS BEHAVIORAL HEALTH, WENDY MONTE, M.D. MOHAMMED YUSUF MODAN and others
Plaintiff:
B. C., THERESA C. and KEVIN C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Martin Rugamba v. CRST Inc, et al
as 20-2934
Defendant / Appellee:
CRST INC, LARRY YEO, CRST MANAGER OF CARLISLE YORK PENNSYLVANIA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARTIN RUGAMBA
Simms v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2020cv01411
Defendant:
S. Pasquale, Dr. Dancha, John DOE and others
Plaintiff:
Shawn M Simms
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FRANCIS et al v. SUMMIT MEDICAL GROUP FOUNDATION et al
as 2:2020cv01411
Defendant:
DOES 1-10, M.D HOWARD BLAUSTEIN, MD WILLIAM A TANSEY, III and others
Plaintiff:
EVERSON FRANCIS and E.F.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
RUGAMBA v. CRST, INC. et al
as 1:2020cv00116
Defendant:
Josh B., Brock Ferry, 2 DMV Unknown Employees Of Cedar Rapids, Ia and others
Plaintiff:
Martin Rugamba
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
RUGAMBA v. CRST, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv06209
Defendant:
JOSH B., BROCK FERRY, 2 DMV UNKNOWN EMPLOYEES OF CEDAR RAPIDS, IA and others
Plaintiff:
MARTIN RUGAMBA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
ABDUR-RAHEEM v. LANIGAN et al
as 3:2018cv10390
Plaintiff:
SHAMSIDDIN ABDUR-RAHEEM
Defendant:
GARY M. LANIGAN, JOHN FALVEY, LINDA SANTORO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ABDUR-RAHEEM v. LANIGAN et al
as 3:2018cv04259
Plaintiff:
SHAMSIDDIN ABDUR-RAHEEM
Defendant:
GARY M. LANIGAN, STEPHEN D'ILIO, STEVEN JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
