Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Farnell v. Zanon et al
as 2:2023cv02406
Defendant:
Daniel A Zanon Limited, Daniel Ashby Zanon, Unknown Zanon and others
Plaintiff:
Sarah Farnell
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030 Computer Fraud and Abuse Act
Ruiz v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2023cv02241
Plaintiff:
Angel P Ruiz
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Centurion Health Incorporated, Richard Pratt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Thompson #118950 v. Unknown Party et al
as 2:2022cv00120
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Thompson
Defendant:
Unknown Party, Unknown Parties, David Shinn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hussein v. Penzone et al
as 2:2021cv02013
Plaintiff:
Mustafa Nabeel Hussein
Defendant:
Paul Penzone and Unknown Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stuart et al v. Scottsdale, City of et al
as 2:2021cv01917
Plaintiff:
Mark E Stuart and Virginia G Stuart
Defendant:
Scottsdale, City of, WJ Lane, Unknown Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kitko #330785 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2020cv02255
Defendant:
Thomas Staab, Donna Mendoza, Corizon Medical and others
Plaintiff:
Frank G Kitko, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goff #186716 v. Coleman et al
as 2:2020cv01557
Defendant:
Unknown Morris, Unknown Kimble, David Shinn and others
Plaintiff:
Shawn Charles Goff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goff #186716 v. Kimble et al
as 2:2020cv01392
Defendant:
Unknown Morris, Unknown Rode, Unknown Kimble and others
Plaintiff:
Shawn Charles Goff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simcox #311769 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2020cv01294
Defendant:
Unknown Repp, Unknown Cameron, Ronald Towles and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Allen Simcox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goff #186716 v. Trinity Food Service et al
as 2:2020cv01288
Defendant:
Pam Smith, Trinity Food Service, Unknown Parties and others
Plaintiff:
Shawn Charles Goff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
