Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Powell et al v. Kloss
as 6:2020cv06145
Defendant:
Dale E. Kloss
Plaintiff:
Lani Powell, Taylor Smith, Cheyenne Kimbrell and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Lyons v. Moore et al
as 1:2016cv00145
Plaintiff:
Chandra Lyons
Defendant:
Moore, Holst, Babb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanders v. Kelley et al
as 5:2016cv00190
Plaintiff:
Daniel Sanders
Defendant:
Wendy Kelley, Ray Hobbs, Larry Mays and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanders v. Kelley et al
as 5:2015cv00042
Plaintiff:
Daniel Sanders
Defendant:
Wendy Kelley, Ray Hobbs, Larry May and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perkins v. Venable et al
as 5:2014cv00329
Plaintiff:
Corey Perkins
Defendant:
Donna Venable, Willie Bankston, R Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jim Venable Company Inc v. MI Windows and Doors Inc
as 4:2012cv00111
Plaintiff:
Jim Venable Company Inc
Defendant:
MI Windows and Doors Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jim Venable Company Inc v. Delvalle et al
as 4:2011cv00639
Plaintiff:
Jim Venable Company Inc
Defendant:
David Delvalle, Window Depot of Buffalo LLC and Elizabeth Delvalle
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Johnson v. Norris et al
as 5:2010cv00015
Plaintiff:
Derrick Lee Johnson
Defendant:
Larry Norris, Ray Hobbs, Grant Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROADS Inc et al v. Jacksonville Arkansas, City of et al
as 4:2007cv01220
Plaintiff:
ROADS Inc, Richard Venable, Darius Sims and others
Defendant:
Jacksonville Arkansas, City of, Lonoke Arkansas, City of, North Little Rock Arkansas, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Venable v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 4:2007cv04075
Plaintiff:
Matthew Venable
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
