Cases 1 - 10 of 186
Sarjeant et al v. City of Long Beach et al
as 4:2024cv01216
Defendant:
ALLIED FLUID PRODUCTS CORP., formerly known as ALLIED PACKING & SUPPLY, INC., KM Industries Holding Co., Inc., formerly known as Kelly-Moore Paint Company, Inc., Owl Companies, individually and as parent, alter-ego-equitable trustee, joint venture, and as succesoor-in-interest to Smith-Amelco and Owl Constuctors, formerly known as HC. Smith Construction Co. and others
Plaintiff:
James Sarjeant and Lucretia Sarjeant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Dennis v. Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation, et al.
as 23-4283
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROSA DENNIS, individually and as successor-in-interest to PATRICK W. DENNIS (Deceased)
Defendant / Appellee:
FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION, FOSTER WHEELER LLC, IMO INDUSTRIES, INC., sued indvidually and as successor-in-interest to Delaval Steam Turbine Company and Delaval, Inc. and others
Defendant:
AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, sued individually and as successor-by merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc., AMTROL, INC., individually and as successor-in interest to H.A. TRUSH, VIACOMCBS INC., formerly known as CBS Corporation; formerly known as Viacom Inc successor by merger to CBS Corporation, a Pennsylvania corporation; formerly known as Westinghouse Electric Corporation and others
Rawlings v. American Optical Corporation et al
as 2:2023cv01794
Plaintiff:
Richard Rawlings
Defendant:
Greene Tweed & Co., Inc., American Optical Corporation, Armstrong International, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Boyce A. Stringer et al v. American Biltrite, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv09813
Defendant:
DOMCO PRODUCTS TEXAS, INC., Individually and as Successor-In-Interest to, and formerly known as DOMCO INC., FLOOR PRODUCTS (TEXAS), AZROCK INDUSTRIES INC., UVALDE ROCK ASPHALT COMPANY, REDCO CORPORATION, formerly known as CRANE CO., Individually and as Successor-In-Interest to COCHRANE CORPORATION, AMERICAN BILTRITE INC. and others
Plaintiff:
Boyce Stringer, Nancy Stringer, Boyce A. Stringer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Asbestos Litigation
Attebury et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv05014
Plaintiff:
Ervel Attebury and Lutrecia Attebury
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Armstrong International Inc., Aurora Pump Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Long v. 3M Company et al
as 3:2023cv01325
Defendant:
3M Company, Clark-Reliance LLC, Crane Environmental, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Richard D Long
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Panagiota Vrontou et al v. Astra Flooring Company et al
as 2:2023cv05930
Plaintiff:
Panagiota Vrontou and Mariana Vrontou
Petitioner:
VIAD CORP (sued individually and as successor-in-interest to GRISCOM RUSSELL COMPANY)
Defendant:
Astra Flooring Company, Bae Systems San Diego Ship Repair Inc., Crown Cork & Seal Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Asbestos Litigation
Rovier Carrington v. National Amusements, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv05399
Plaintiff:
Rovier Carrington
Defendant:
National Amusements, Inc., Paramount Global, f/k/a ViacomCBS Inc., f/k/a CBS Corporation, a Delaware corporation, f/k/a Viacom Inc., successor by merger to CBS Corporation, a Pennsylvania corporation, f/k/a Westinghouse Electri, Paramount Pictures Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Gary L. Faulk et al v. General Electric Company et al
as 2:2023cv05132
Defendant:
Paramount Global, TA Aerospace Co., General Electric Company and others
Plaintiff:
Gary L Faulk, Andrew D. Faulk, Ethan G. Faulk and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Sorenson v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 2:2023cv00804
Defendant:
Canvas Ct LLC, Cleaver-Brooks Inc, Honeywell International Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Norita C Sorenson and Reid S Sorenson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
