Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03756
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00376
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv12191
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00114
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Caplan v. Patel et al
as 9:2017cv81274
Plaintiff:
Howard Michael Caplan
Defendant:
Vijaykumar C. Patel , Chhaganbhaz G. Patel , 820 Investment Properties, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
v. PATEL et al
as 1:2009cv03062
Defendant:
VIJAYKUMAR AMICHANDBHAI PATEL, BHAVANABEN BALADEVBHAI PATEL and Janet Napolitano
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
PATEL et al v. Napolitano
as 1:2009cv03060
Plaintiff:
VIJAYKUMAR AMICHANDBHAI PATEL and BHAVANABEN BALADEVBHAI PATEL
Defendant:
Janet Napolitano
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
PATEL et al v. Napolitano
as 8:2009cv03069
Plaintiff:
VIJAYKUMAR AMICHANDBHAI PATEL and BHAVANABEN BALADEVBHAI PATEL
Defendant:
Janet Napolitano
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
PATEL et al v. Napolitano
as 1:2009cv03065
Plaintiff:
VIJAYKUMAR AMICHANDBHAI PATEL and BHAVANABEN BALADEVBHAI PATEL
Defendant:
Janet Napolitano
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
PATEL et al v. Napolitano
as 1:2009cv03069
Plaintiff:
VIJAYKUMAR AMICHANDBHAI PATEL and BHAVANABEN BALADEVBHAI PATEL
Defendant:
Janet Napolitano
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
