Cases 1 - 10 of 100
WYNDHAM HOTELS & RESORTS, INC. et al v. CJS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2026cv10331
Plaintiff:
WYNDHAM HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., WYNDHAM HOTEL GROUP, LLC and SUPER 8 WORLDWIDE, INC.
Defendant:
CJS CORPORATION, CHARLES CHOE, SALONI, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SHETH et al
as 2:2026cv05852
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
PANKAJ SHETH, RAJAN SHETH, RENUKA SHETH and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv08739
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2026cv02084
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Mody v. Mehta et al
as 3:2026cv00762
Plaintiff:
Chirag Mody
Defendant:
Vimal Mehta, Peter Mueller, June Bray and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Aidoo v. Batchelor et al
as 1:2026cv02032
Plaintiff:
Betty Aidoo
Defendant:
Senior Judge Ronnie K. Batchelor, Asset Funding Group, LLC, Vimal Modi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Vrana v. Mueller et al
as 3:2026cv00423
Plaintiff:
Travis Vrana
Defendant:
Peter Mueller, June Bray, Sandeep Laumas and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
(PC) Reddy v. CDCR et al
as 2:2025cv03653
Plaintiff:
Vimal Nand Reddy
Defendant:
CDCR, Warden and Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv00893
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
(PC) Reddy v. Rubi, et al
as 2:2025cv02906
Plaintiff:
Vimal Nand Reddy
Defendant:
Rubi, Armstead, Vidania and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
