Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Lajuana Danette White v. Fesia Davenport et al
as 8:2023cv02300
Plaintiff:
Lajuana Danette White
Defendant:
Fesia Davenport, Lisa Garrett, Mona Patuano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 6:2022cv01799
Plaintiff:
Vincent Jones
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of Commissioner's Final Decision
(SS) Jones v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv01388
Plaintiff:
Kyle Vincent Jones
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
JONES v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv13380
Plaintiff:
CARL VINCENT JONES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Phillips v. Hancock et al
as 4:2022cv00352
Plaintiff:
Donnie Earl Phillips, Jr.
Defendant:
Michael Hancock, Caesar Moore, Jackie Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Jones v. Sacramento County Main Jail Medical Services
as 2:2021cv01313
Plaintiff:
Vincent Jones
Defendant:
Sacramento County Main Jail Medical Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv20705
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
VINCENT JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Williams et al
as 1:2021cv00073
Plaintiff:
L A Johnson
Defendant:
S Forblacka, Bryan Williams, Pronde Klien and others
Petitioner:
Vincent Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vincent Jones v. Florida Department of Corr.
as 21-10331
Petitioner / Appellant:
VINCENT JONES
Respondent / Appellee:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Jones v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 0:2020cv62667
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Vincent Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
