Cases 21 - 30 of 41
Pitts v. Bradsher et al
as 4:2015cv00353
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Pitts
Defendant:
Bradsher, Kenny Ford, Joel Ware and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pride v. Vailes et al
as 5:2015cv00126
Plaintiff:
John E Pride
Defendant:
Ashley Vailes, Tashara White, James Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Courtney Smith v. John Felts, et al
as 15-1530
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Courtney Smith
Defendant - Appellee:
John Felts, Chairman, Arkansas Parole Board, Ashley Vailes, Hearing Examiner, Arkansas Parole Board, Rodney Wright, Jr., Parole Officer, Arkansas Parole Office and others
Seyoum Clark v. Chioma Hawkins, et al
as 15-1504
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Seyoum Ali Clark
Defendant - Appellee:
Chioma Hawkins, Supervising Parole Officer (DCC), Ashley Vailes, Hearing Examiner, Arkansas Parole Board (DCC), Doc Holiday, Pulaski County Sheriff and others
Thomas v. Paxton et al
as 4:2015cv00104
Plaintiff:
Brian Kenneth Thomas
Defendant:
Lindsey Paxton, Ashley Vailes and Arkansas Department of Community Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Batsche et al v. Burwell
as 0:2015cv00053
Plaintiff:
Paul Batsche , Scott Gale , Jeff Huberty and others
Defendant:
Sylvia Mathews Burwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Clark et al v. Vailes et al
as 4:2015cv00010
Plaintiff:
Seyoum Ali Clark
Defendant:
Chioma Hawkins, Ashley Vailes, Doc Holiday and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Felts et al
as 4:2014cv00754
Plaintiff:
Courtney Smith
Defendant:
John Felts, Ashley Vailes, Rodney Wright, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vail v. Colvin
as 6:2014cv03449
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Sharon Vail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Rogers et al v. Strong et al
as 4:2014cv00513
Plaintiff:
Chamika Rogers, Chamaya Rogers, Chamacia Rogers and others
Defendant:
Seacombe Strong, Michael L Thomas, Davidson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
