Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Khoury et al v. American Honda Motor, Co., Inc. et al
as 2:2026cv10554
Plaintiff:
Shaker Khoury and Eva Shaker
Defendant:
American Honda Motor, Co., Inc. and Valencia H. Imports, Inc. d/b/a AutoNation Honda Valencia
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Valencia v. Vargas et al
as 1:2026cv07450
Plaintiff:
Eric Valencia
Defendant:
M. Vargas, Yang and Josh Gibbs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Jenkins v. City of Los Angeles, et al.
as 26-5927
Plaintiff:
Sargent DEBRA LYNN JENKINS, SN39547
Defendant:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a Municipal Entity and Employer Los Angeles Police, JAMES FRONTIER, Lt. GILLAN, SN 35215 and others
Valencia v. The Green Machine, LLC et al
as 2:2026cv05606
Plaintiff:
Giovanni Valencia
Defendant:
The Green Machine, LLC, Jason Wittover, Michael Wittover and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv05219
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Williams v. State Of Texas
as 4:2026cv07503
Plaintiff:
Valencia Williams
Defendant:
State Of Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Valencia v. Federal Express Corporation
as 5:2026cv09922
Plaintiff:
Emilio Valencia
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C. v. 2.711 Acres in Humphreys County, Mississippi et al
as 4:2026cv00168
Plaintiff:
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C.
Defendant:
2.711 Acres in Humphreys County, Mississippi, Murphy Eaton, Estate of James L. Leavy, Sr. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv02300
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
