Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Miller v. US
as 23-2071
Petitioner:
RYAN VAN MILLER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES
Interested Party:
COMMERCEBANK, N.A., FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, FIRST PRYORITY BANK and others
Miller v. US
as 23-1552
Petitioner / Appellant:
RYAN VAN MILLER
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Shane Villarino, et al v. Pacesetter Personnel Service, Inc., et al
as 23-10645
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHANE VILLARINO, LAURA KAREN JOHNSON, JEFFERY MONDY and others
Defendant / Appellee:
PACESETTER PERSONNEL SERVICE, INC., PACESETTER PERSONNEL SERVICE OF FLORIDA, INC., FLORIDA STAFFING SERVICE, INC. and others
Villarino et al v. Pacesetter Personnel Service, Inc. et al
as 0:2020cv60192
Defendant:
Pacesetter Personnel Service of Florida, Inc., Pacesetter Personnel Service, Inc., Florida Staffing Service, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Mondy, Shane Villarino, Laura J Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Miller v. Donald Wyatt Det. Facility
as 17-1709
Petitioner - Appellant:
RYAN VAN MILLER
Respondent - Appellee:
DONALD WYATT DETENTION FACILITY INCORPORATED
United States of America v. Taylor
as 14-360
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
John Smith, AKA Kazoo, Ricky Allen, Terrance Hall, AKA Bam and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Dewey Taylor, AKA Road Rash
Nathan Van Miller v. Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles
as 2:2008cv06240
Petitioner:
Nathan Van Miller
Respondent:
Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv01556
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Nathan Van Miller v. Lee Baca et al
as 2:2008cv03978
Plaintiff:
Nathan Van Miller
Defendant:
Lee Baca, The Los Angeles Deputy Sheriff's, Hunter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
