Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Pitts et al v. O'Geary et al
as 5:2012cv00343
Plaintiff:
Alan Pitts, Seneca Nicholson-Pitts and Deryl Von Williams
Defendant:
James D. O'Geary , Ray Griffin , Frank Frazier and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Davis v. Jumo et al
as 5:2012ct03043
Plaintiff:
Michael Wayne Davis
Defendant:
Terry Jumo, Ruby Williams, Peter White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pitts et al v. United States Housing and Urban Development et al
as 5:2012cv00072
Plaintiff:
Alan Pitts and Seneca Nicholson-Pitts
Defendant:
United States Housing and Urban Development, Atlanta Home Ownership Center, Jennifer Harry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Daniel Orr v. J. Bank
as 12-6126
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL WAYNE ORR
Defendant - Appellee:
J. HENRY BANKS, individually and in his/her official capacity as Justice of the District Court of Vance County
Perkinson v. White et al
as 5:2011ct03190
Plaintiff:
Michael Scott Perkinson
Defendant:
Peter White, Ruby Williams, James Baines and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pitts et al v. United States Housing and Urban Development et al
as 5:2011cv00223
Plaintiff:
Alan Pitts and Seneca Nicholson
Defendant:
United States Housing and Urban Development, Atlanta Home Ownership Center, Jennifer Harry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
The Noble Moors of the "Bey and "El" Tribes et al v. State of North Carolina et al
as 2:2008cv00021
Plaintiff:
The Noble Moors of the "Bey and "El" Tribes, James Anderson-Bey, Eric Evans-El and others
Defendant:
State of North Carolina, Cumberland County District Attorney, Cumberland County Clerk of Court and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2007cv00384
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
