Cases 1 - 10 of 35
HECKER v. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY et al
as 2:2021cv02701
Defendant:
SEARGENT WHARTON, JIMMY KIMMEL, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER R HECKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Podkulski v. Youksoulian et al
as 1:2018cv07089
Defendant:
Director Gavin, Martha Youksoulian and 8 Various John & Jane Doe Sgts and Lts.
Plaintiff:
Steven Podkulski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fleming v. The City of New York
as 18-1555
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Robert Fleming
Defendant - Appellee:
The City of New York, Bronx District Attorney, Nancy Barko and others
Kaplan v. The City of New York
as 18-1176
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Peter Kaplan
Defendant - Appellee:
City of New York, Police Officer Marcos Martinez, Various John/Jane Does, Individually and others
Defendant:
Attorney Michael Frantel and Police Officer Edward Raniola, 19th Precinct 153 East 67th Street New York, NY 10065
Fleming v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2018cv03777
Plaintiff:
Robert Fleming
Defendant:
The City of New York, Bronx District Attorney, Nancy Barko and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shanks v. Dimas et al
as 4:2017cv04249
Plaintiff:
David Shanks
Defendant:
James Dimas, Anderson Freeman, Sharon Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hargett v. Freeman et al
as 4:2017cv04227
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Hargett
Defendant:
Anderson Freeman, James Dimas, Sharon Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Escobar v. Dimas et al
as 4:2017cv04230
Plaintiff:
Aristides Escobar
Defendant:
James Dimas, Anderson Freeman, Sharon Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sundling v. Dimas et al
as 4:2017cv04224
Plaintiff:
Joseph Sundling
Defendant:
James Dimas, Anderson Freeman, Sharon Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Webb v. Dimas et al
as 4:2017cv04212
Plaintiff:
Richard G Webb
Defendant:
James Dimas, Anderson Freeman, Sharon Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
