Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Arizona, State of et al v. Michael D Lansky LLC et al
as 4:2023cv00233
Plaintiff:
Arizona, State of, Alabama, State of, Arkansas, State of and others
Defendant:
Michael D Lansky LLC an Arizona limited liability company doing business as Avid Telecom, Michael D Lansky individually as a Member/Manager/Chief Executive Officer of Michael D Lansky LLC doing business as Avid Telecom and Stacy S Reeves individually as a Manager/Vice President of Michael D Lansky LLC doing business as Avid Telecom
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Antonyuk v. Hochul
as 22-2972
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Ivan Antonyuk, Corey Johnson, Alfred Terrille and others
Defendant:
William Fitzpatrick, in his Official Capacity as the Onondaga County District Attorney, Eugene Conway, in his Official Capacity as the Sheriff of Onondaga County, P. David Soares, in his Official Capacity as the District Attorney of Albany County and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Joseph Cecile
Amicus Curiae:
The City of New York, New York County District Attorney, Greater New York Hospital Association and others
Petitioner:
Bishops of the Episcopal Church in New York and New England et al, Jaclyn Schildkraut and 30 Members of New York State Legislature
United States of America et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 3:2021mc80065
Plaintiff:
Tennessee, New York, State of, State of Nevada and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation and Oncology Therapeutics Network Corporation
3Rd Party Defendant:
Office of the A California State Board of Pharmacy
A.M. v. French
as 20-1772
Defendant / Appellee:
Daniel M. French, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Vermont Agency of Education
Plaintiff / Appellant:
A.H., by and through her parents and natural guardians, James Hester and Darlene Hester, other James Hester, other Darlene Hester, Darlene Hester, individually, Christopher Messineo, individually and others
Defendant:
George B. Spaulding, in his official capacity as Chancellor of the Vermont State Colleges System, AKA Jeb
Eugene Lavergne, et al v. United States House of Rep, et al
as 19-5028
Defendant / Appellee:
Kim Guadagno, Honorable Lt. Governor/Secretary of State, Christopher Porrino, Honorable Acting New Jersey State Attorney General, Karen L. Haas and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Eugene Martin Lavergne
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Allen J. Cannon, Frederick John Lavergne, Scott Neuman and others
Wakefield v. Scott
as 19-263
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Tabitha Wakefield
Defendant / Appellee:
Phil Scott, in his official and individual capacity as Governor of the State of Vermont, Matthew Birmingham, in his official and individual capacity as Director of the Vermont State Police, Zachary Gauthier, in his official and individual capacity as a Vermont State Patrol Officer and others
Federal Trade Commission et al v. Cancer Fund of America Incorporated et al
as 2:2015cv00884
Defendant:
James Reynolds, II, Cancer Fund of America Incorporated a Delaware corporation doing business as Breast Cancer Financial Assistance Fund, Cancer Support Services Incorporated and others
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission, Alabama, State of, Alaska, State of and others
Receiver:
Receivership Management Incorporated
Petitioner:
First Tennessee Bank NA, Associated Community Services Incorporated and Central Processing Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045
Sheerin v. State of Vermont
as 2:2015cv00069
Plaintiff:
Patricia R. Sheerin
Defendant:
Vermont, State of
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Zahler v. United States et al
as 2:2012cv03075
Plaintiff:
Eric Zahler
Defendant:
United States, United States Supreme Court, Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Zorn v. State of Vermont
as 12-1607
Petitioner:
Robert E. Zorn
Respondent:
State of Vermont, United States of America, Vermont State Police and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
