Cases 1 - 10 of 88
King v. Auto Max Corporation et al
as 2:2023cv02350
Plaintiff:
VERNON KING
Defendant:
Auto Max Corporation and I & A Auto Sales, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
King v. Britt et al
as 4:2023cv01172
Plaintiff:
Vernon King, Jr
Defendant:
M P Britt, Blake Lamb, D. Blackshire and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
King v. Auto Max Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv00753
Plaintiff:
Vernon King
Defendant:
Auto Max Corporation and I & A Auto Sales, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
King v. Lamb et al
as 4:2022cv00863
Plaintiff:
Vernon King, Jr
Defendant:
Blake Lamb, D L Blackshire, T Austin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Richardson
as 21-20593
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Vernon King, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Jeffery S. Richardson, Terry Bursoh, Assistant Warden, Tracy Hutto, Assistant Warden and others
King, Jr. v. Richardson et al
as 4:2021cv02952
Plaintiff:
Vernon King, Jr.
Defendant:
Jeffery S Richardson, Terry Bursoh, Tracy Hutto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vance v. HII Fleet Support Group LLC et al
as 3:2021cv01282
Plaintiff:
Vernon King Vance, Sr.
Defendant:
HII Fleet Support Group LLC, Jason Thomas, Gina M. Andrade and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 fm
King v. Selman et al
as 4:2019cv01737
Respondent:
C. Lee, S. Logan, k. Gunter and others
Petitioner:
Vernon King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vernon King, Jr. v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 18-20426
Petitioner - Appellant:
VERNON KING, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Vernon King, Jr. v. D. D. Lott, et al
as 18-20424
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VERNON KING, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
D. D. LOTT, Lieutenant, SERBEPIE LANDOL, JR., ASSISTANT WARDEN CLACOX and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
